|
|
Post by admin on Jul 23, 2009 19:09:33 GMT
It does indeed, though it runs along a small section of Church Lane through Cantley, which is why I have "Bessacarr / Cantley Lane" & "Cantley / Cantley Lane" to try and avoid this confusion.
You are correct about the 55B and 91 where they join, though if I was to do this, it would make the area quite messy in my view, which is why I've left it the way that it is at the moment. I'll keep this change in mind though.
Sadly with the layout at the moment and limited space, I'm struggling to fit it all in, hence one of the reasons why the 59 has been dropped from the map. I'll have a closer look tonight and possibly re-design the Bessacarr and Cantley areas to reflect the routes better.
Ta,
Sam
|
 |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 23, 2009 19:18:52 GMT
After closer observation, the only way I could make the change, would be to carry on down from "Cantley / McAuley Upper School" it would make it more realistic, but I won't be able to get it directly opposite where the 55B comes out of West Bessacarr, due to the nature of the map design (the curve). I'll do this now. Only a 5 minute change if that.
Also anyone actually know of any more Pubs, Shops, Landmarks or Parks between Cantley Roundabout and Cantley Bridge/Lights at all?
Ta,
Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Post by moonraker79 on Jul 23, 2009 19:32:31 GMT
Also anyone actually know of any more Pubs, Shops, Landmarks or Parks between Cantley Roundabout and Cantley Bridge/Lights at all? Rose Hill Cemetery. |
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 23, 2009 19:41:34 GMT
Also anyone actually know of any more Pubs, Shops, Landmarks or Parks between Cantley Roundabout and Cantley Bridge/Lights at all? Rose Hill Cemetery. Already included on the map  Ta, Sam |
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 23, 2009 19:56:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by markno16 on Jul 23, 2009 19:57:25 GMT
After closer observation, the only way I could make the change, would be to carry on down from "Cantley / McAuley Upper School" it would make it more realistic, but I won't be able to get it directly opposite where the 55B comes out of West Bessacarr, due to the nature of the map design (the curve). I'll do this now. Only a 5 minute change if that. Thats what I meant Sam! I would still say the peaktime 91 diversion goes directly past the Cantley Water Towers whereas the 57 only serves the end of Church Lane at Goodison Boulevard and doesn't go past the Water Towers. However that would require an extensive map change in that area. Keep it in mind. |
|
|
|
|
Post by markno16 on Jul 23, 2009 20:00:46 GMT
I've just looked, and much better!
|
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 23, 2009 20:03:33 GMT
I've just looked, and much better! Good to hear that. Hopefully the map is now fully correct  Ta, Sam |
|
|
|
|
Post by Tom B on Jul 23, 2009 20:05:47 GMT
Already included on the map Ta, Sam Rose Hill, Beechers Brook, Cantley Park, Everingham Road Shops. |
|
|
|
|
Post by barrycygnetbus on Jul 29, 2009 10:23:19 GMT
Hi Sam
Just checked the Hulley of Baslow fleetlist can you alter the following
1 MX-06 ACV is type M880SL
2 P881 PWW is type 9-8SDL to B41F not C40F (first Coach Dart !!)
4 M437 PVY new as M437 PUY then URH 341
5 P273 NRH Sold
New 5 PL-06 TGE Dennis Dart SLF MCV B40F
7 Y93 HUA is actually Y293 HUA and is type DE12CSSB120
9 R280 RAU sold to a welsh operator
New 9 MX-09 AOF Optare Solo M780SL Optare B28F
10 MX-56 ACG is actually MX-56 ACF and is type M880SL
14/15 N360/2 VRC are Actually 11/12
New 14 is M803 PRA MAN 11-190 Optare B40F
New 15 is N361 VRC Dennis Lance Optare B40F
17 M802 PRA is type 11-190
18 P659 BUB was new as P2 JJL
19 P120 GSR is to B41F not B40F
Hope this helps, Please keep up the good work
Barry
|
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 29, 2009 18:25:21 GMT
Hi Barry,
Those changes will be updated within the next few minutes.
Ta,
Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Post by barrycygnetbus on Jul 29, 2009 20:33:03 GMT
Hi Sam
Sorry my mistake with Hulley of Baslow No 4 It is now registered M437 PVY, it is not your fault it is the way i wrote it on the list of updates.
Sorry again
Barry
|
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 30, 2009 18:27:34 GMT
Hi Barry,
Yeah, I must have read it/interpreted it wrongly. I'll change it within the next few minutes.
Ta,
Sam
|
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 30, 2009 18:31:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Aug 9, 2009 17:41:54 GMT
|
|
|
