|
|
|
|
Post by asourdirective on May 4, 2007 19:46:47 GMT
MASS Transit anyone?
That website isn't registered yet either, if anyone wants to potentially make some money!
|
 |
|
|
|
Post by 22438 on May 4, 2007 19:52:21 GMT
Exactly what I was thinking! |
|
|
|
|
Post by mattw on May 4, 2007 21:25:40 GMT
nope STG East Midlands though what suprises me is that the airport will choose the livery.
*HINT* Finningley Depot is just the other side of the runway!
|
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on May 5, 2007 8:19:57 GMT
I believe it was the NCC who chose the livery as there paying for the service & if you noticed in atleast 1 of the pictures one of the buses did have the NCC logo on the front so really its pritty much the same situation as our PTE with buses they supply for routes i.e. 61/62 hence the livery.
Mass may be at the otherside of the runway like stated but i doubt they could have manged to run it both from staff levels as the PVR is 5/6 buses as opposed to 1 on the old 29 and that wasn't all day either & they'd need sufficent low floors to cover which they haven't got unless of course more Titans were brought in then if theirs a age restriction on what the NCC want to be used that means none of them can do it. Id say from the general publics point of view SEM is the best choice as it allows people who use exsisting SEM services between point X and Y to use their passes etc on this route as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by tox0114 on May 5, 2007 13:25:44 GMT
They look rather good, not sure about the livery though, too many different colours what don't really go that well with each other.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by thrybergh on May 6, 2007 11:03:04 GMT
Am i the only person on here who seems to quite like the new branding?
It looks really good and professional in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by mattw on May 6, 2007 15:27:38 GMT
no. the livery looks quite nice though i was just saying it looked identical to the MASS livery (when clean).
The livery does look decent and uses the green / white of Robin Hood though dont know where the red comes from.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by donnytom on May 6, 2007 18:35:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by mattw on May 6, 2007 19:34:35 GMT
That website isn't registered yet either, if anyone wants to potentially make some money! wondered what you was on about there! just had a closer look at the pictures and tried the website ... Hey Presto! Error 404. so if i go and register this domain for £1.99 i could sell it back to them for a few hundred quid as they will have branded all the buses before they realise. might go and do this later! |
|
|
|
|
Post by Tom B on May 6, 2007 20:28:42 GMT
A 404 is not a definite indication that the domain is unregistered.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by mattw on May 6, 2007 20:34:25 GMT
A 404 is not a definite indication that the domain is unregistered. though surley been able to buy this domain is a indication that it is unregistered? |
|
|
|
|
Post by asourdirective on May 6, 2007 20:47:52 GMT
A 404 is not a definite indication that the domain is unregistered. though surley been able to buy this domain is a indication that it is unregistered? Exactly, A WHOIS search revealed that currently no-one owns or has registered the site! |
|
|
|
|
Post by manclad on May 6, 2007 21:16:21 GMT
Yawn
|
|
|
|
|
Post by mattw on May 6, 2007 21:17:16 GMT
wonder how much it would wind up SEM if someone on here did actually register that domain. dont suspect it would take much to change the branding from .com to .co.uk though.
|
|
|
