Rotherham bus partnership consultation. (Read 3,906 times)

[duncan]

The draft consultation is now on its way and seems to offer pretty bad news for bus users in Rotherham.

A summary of proposals is below. Make up your own minds.

1 - no change
1a - no change
2 - no change
3 - withdrawn
4 - withdrawn
7 - re-routed vis Ferham Road and extended to Meadowhall
8 - re-routed via Ferham road
10 - rerouted via Flanderwell as per old 10a
11/2 no change
13 revised route via Fitzwilliam road and Dalton Magna instead of hospital and Brecks.
13a no change
14 increased frequency (every 15 minutes)
15 increased frequency ( every 10 minutes)
18 unchanged
18b unchanged
19/a/b unchanged
20 unchanged
22/22x route unchanged - possible frequency changes
25 new route replacing current 34 between Rotherham and Whiston every 30 minutes
26 Barnsley - Westfield - unchanged
27 route curtailed to Rotherham - Crystal Peaks only with revised route in Aston. (Current route then from Lodge lane via mansfield road to a57 to Beighton then current route)
27a withdrawn
29/ 29a withdrawn
31 timetable revisions
32 - current route to Handsworth then via Parkway to Sheffield.
33 - revised route in Brinsworth, serving Whitehill Lane instead of Howarth Road, then extending to Harthill via Swallownest , Wales, and Kiveton. Hourly.
33a as 33 to Kiveton then looping round Todwick and returning via outward route. Hourly.
33b evening variant as 33 to kiveton then serving Todwick and Harthill then back as outward route.
34 - withdrawn
34 - new service replacing 35 but serving Howarth road then whitehill lane, whitehill road, Bonnet Lane then to Meadowhall as per 31 route. every 30 minutes
35 withdrawn
37 extended from Thrybergh to Ravenfield Via Silverwood every 20 minutes
39/40/41/42 - unchanged
43 withdrawn
44 unchanged
45 unchanged
46 new service replacing current 32 between Sheffield and Richmond Road then via Richmond Park Road, Parkway Catcliffe, Treeton every 30 minutes
56/7 unchanged
66 unchanged
67 Barnsley - Brampton unchanged
69 - missing Arunde Gate but serving Meadowhall Way and Weedon street. every 30 minutes
72 - unchanged
78 New route Rotherham - Meadowhall Via X78 route to Pitt Street then via old 34 Route to Meadowhall
87 unchanged
108/9 unchanged
216 unchanged
217 unchanged
218/ 220/ 221 / 222 / 226 / 227 / 228 unchanged
271 revised route via Wales and Kiveton partly replacing 27 links from Crystal Peaks to Kiveton Possibly terminating at Thorpe Salvin due to NCC funding Loss. Not serving Woodal village. every 2 hours.
A1 unchanged
Freebee under review
M92 revised route Foxhill - Chapletown only. No longr serving Harley
x5 unchanged
X7 unchanged
X13 withdrawn
X14 Peak Hour commuter trips only. All other trips withdrawn.
X22 unchanged
X78 unchanged


www.rotherhambuspartnership.co.uk/

[duncan]

Pleased I have a car.

[Deleted]

Nov 1, 2013 2:33:02 GMT duncan said:

Pleased I have a car.

if this goes ahead we will return to being a two car family

[xtopher]

So there will be no buses running to/from The Wilton on Kimberworth Road from/to Coronation Bridge?

I don't fancy the chances of the 7/8 drivers getting out of Psalters Lane onto Meadow Bank Road. A right turn is difficult even at quieter times.

The 78 seems a bizarre idea too.

I hope this ridiculous review stays away from Doncaster as from viewing this, the creators couldn't manage to run a bath let alone a consultation.

[DPL233 (33LUG)]

Is the 69 going to be suffering a cut in frequency?

[duncan]

Nov 1, 2013 10:04:53 GMT DPL233 (33LUG) said:

Is the 69 going to be suffering a cut in frequency?

Yes every 30 minutes instead of every 20 minutes. As well as the ability to sit in even longer queues at Meadowhall now due to serving Meadowhall way.

[duncan]

Nov 1, 2013 9:38:30 GMT xtopher said:

So there will be no buses running to/from The Wilton on Kimberworth Road from/to Coronation Bridge?

I don't fancy the chances of the 7/8 drivers getting out of Psalters Lane onto Meadow Bank Road. A right turn is difficult even at quieter times.

The 78 seems a bizarre idea too.

I hope this ridiculous review stays away from Doncaster as from viewing this, the creators couldn't manage to run a bath let alone a consultation.

My feelings as well. NOT IMPRESSED

[Deleted]

Nov 1, 2013 2:33:02 GMT duncan said:

Pleased I have a car.

Same here. I was looking at it earlier and cannot see a sensible change suggested amongst them. Some of it has been done before and proven it doesn't work like with the 10s. If SYPTE are wanting to increase car useage and lower bus useage then I think they will succeed, otherwise what a shambles.

The best thing that could happen in my opinion is for First to pull out of it.

[Deleted]

Is it me, or is the majority of changes going to be on firsts services?

I don't see any bus from Ravenfield to Wickersley anymore. I thought that was used quite a bit for links to doctors around the tanyard.

[Deleted]

Nov 1, 2013 16:10:16 GMT @mainline2458 said:

Is it me, or is the majority of changes going to be on firsts services?

I don't see any bus from Ravenfield to Wickersley anymore. I thought that was used quite a bit for links to doctors around the tanyard.

13/13A

[Deleted]

Nov 1, 2013 16:32:52 GMT @roadcar said:

Nov 1, 2013 16:10:16 GMT @mainline2458 said:

Is it me, or is the majority of changes going to be on firsts services?

I don't see any bus from Ravenfield to Wickersley anymore. I thought that was used quite a bit for links to doctors around the tanyard.

13/13A

is it much of a substitute?

[xtopher]

I was, like most of us, hoping for a sensible review of the Rotherham bus map and in turn producing a comprehensive system which provides choice, enhanced routes and frequencies. All this appears to do is dilute the provisions and create routes that don't make sense but also include issues at known busy areas and negotiating difficult junctions.

It's hard to comprehend the logic employed here.

[Deleted]

Nov 1, 2013 16:34:45 GMT @mainline2458 said:

Nov 1, 2013 16:32:52 GMT @roadcar said:

13/13A

is it much of a substitute?

If it turns up then I suppose it could partially substitute it

[Deleted]

There was a piece about the partnership in this weeks rotherham advertiser.

Can't wait to read the letters page for the next few weeks

[Deleted]

These proposals seem really poor. The idea of rerouting the 7/8 via Psalters Lane then onto Meadowbank Road would never work, i have sat on a 34 for at least 5 minutes with the bus trying to turn left, the right turn is near impossible at peak hours. Some of the other ideas seem poor, why reroute the 32 when the current route is working at present? The 33 extending beyond Treeton to Aston was tried before at October 2009 & it did not work then, so i don't see it working now. It seems to me to be tryig to cover too many areas with fewer routes.