|
Post by humberside on Oct 13, 2006 16:47:39 GMT
www.northlincs.gov.uk/NorthLincs/News/CouncilStepsInToSaveVitalBusServices.htmI guess this shows that Stageacoch has higher profit margins than RoadCar. I guess similar cuts to other services could come in the future for this reason What depot will Dunn Line use for these services. Alpha's Hull depot is the nearest but the bridge toll would rule that out - so will it be Lincoln (a lot of dead mileage involved) or will they open a new Scunthorpe depot, or even share one with someone else (like they with MASS) Finally, I wonder if no extra money is found in the long term to fund these services, will there be further cuts to buses in North Lincolnshire elsewhere. The last round of cuts were pretty drastic in places. I hope there are no more cuts to come
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on Oct 13, 2006 17:08:44 GMT
Well id imagine if they went out to tender that Stagecoach and Hornsby would have bidded for them therefore i doubt that Veolia would share either of their depots as id imagine not many bus firms would want to share a depot with somebody whove theyve lost work to even if they are paying, so id imagine maybe a new depot. I notice how Veolia are sticking to purely contract work and how they wont take on any of their competitors in nottingham/lincoln/sheffield/rotherham/hull/scunthorpe/worksop/retford on a fully commerciall basis. Personally i cant see how Veolia can make much profit out of their tenders as they put in very low bids compared to the other firms out there & i cant imagine their costs been drastically lower maybe wages but other factors are likely to be of a similar level. Id imagine if they open their own depot in the scunthorpe area it will be just a outstation as id imagine the above routes would only be several buses worth of work like the A1/173/174 are.
|
|
|
|
Post by donnytom on Oct 13, 2006 17:37:05 GMT
Maybe the time is right for Isle Coaches to start expanding...
|
|
|
|
Post by maxtom115 on Oct 13, 2006 19:13:03 GMT
This example shows exactly what is wrong with the public transport industry in this country today - profit centred thinking, not customer focuessed thinking and service provision. At least Veolia/Dunn-Line will provide a service while Stagecoach in Lincolnshire will have even more dissatisfied customers than they have already got following cuts in Lincoln - to be quite honest I now try to avoid travelling SiL if I can, why should my money go to company shareholders and not be put back into the services I am travelling on?
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on Oct 13, 2006 19:48:52 GMT
Maybe the time is right for Isle Coaches to start expanding... Would be a good idea id imagine they could easilly get the 398 tender if i remember rightly it starts up in their area and runs via the various isle of axeholme villages to gainsborough. I dimagine there location goes against them though, lot of potential for the 291 + 399 if they can find the staff though id imagine the 190 would be up their street as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on Oct 13, 2006 19:52:24 GMT
This example shows exactly what is wrong with the public transport industry in this country today - profit centred thinking, not customer focuessed thinking and service provision. At least Veolia/Dunn-Line will provide a service while Stagecoach in Lincolnshire will have even more dissatisfied customers than they have already got following cuts in Lincoln - to be quite honest I now try to avoid travelling SiL if I can, why should my money go to company shareholders and not be put back into the services I am travelling on? Some how doubt that Veolia would be providing this service if the county council hadn't thrown £30,000 at them or if theyd asked them to run it commercially so you could say theres profit centered thinking at play there as well. I suppose the comments about shareholders is the same with any firm though with Veolia id imagine the money goes back to investors in France as opposed to Stagecoach where investors are probably mainly people over here & id imagine when it comes to Veolia the only reason buses are modern in some cases is because like the A1 for example their SLF spec so who ever ran them whether it be Powell, Stagecoach, First, Tm, Mass etc theyd have to do the same anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by donnytom on Oct 13, 2006 21:06:09 GMT
From what people have said on here, Veioaioaieoiolalioieoiaielaieialeiadunnlineconnex can't meet the low-floor provision on their existing routes, never mind any new ones!
|
|
|
|
Post by humberside on Oct 14, 2006 9:07:19 GMT
Well id imagine if they went out to tender that Stagecoach and Hornsby would have bidded for them therefore i doubt that Veolia would share either of their depots as id imagine not many bus firms would want to share a depot with somebody whove theyve lost work to even if they are paying, so id imagine maybe a new depot. MASS used tom operate the 173/174 and they are using a MASS Depot to operate those routes
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on Oct 14, 2006 18:56:23 GMT
But MASS isn't your average company is it, they probably see letting veolia share there depot and possibly other factors i.e. maintanence, fuel etc as a very easy way of making money without doing anything, somehow doubt if Veolia went upto stagecoach and said can we base our buses at your Scunny depot theyd go yeah sure more like bugger off as i doubt any business would be happy sharing a base with someone who could potentially take your remaining tender work away from you next time its up & id imagine stagecoach may have wanted to get those routes back on tender or if they lost them to hornsby as opposed to somebody new to the area as its gone from 1 other firm against them when it comes to tender work to now 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by humberside on Oct 14, 2006 20:36:26 GMT
Thinking about it, Veolia could maybe share with Holloways as they dont operate any contracted service buses
|
|
|
jt
Driver
Posts: 397
|
Post by jt on Oct 16, 2006 19:38:20 GMT
well, the cuts in lincoln wasn;t that bad, nor are these cuts, in scunthorpe, althourgh I putting my money on that stageoach wan;t SUB on that No7, 8 route, but lose out!
Just becasue it Popular doesn;t MEAN it Profitably!
|
|
|
jt
Driver
Posts: 397
|
Post by jt on Oct 17, 2006 16:54:56 GMT
also POINT OUT:
Road car Cut thoses service about 3 years to SAVE money - 7/8 a hugh area of house schme lost the bus to people had to walk further to cacth their bus.
|
|
|
|
Post by manontheinside on Oct 17, 2006 17:12:54 GMT
"to be quite honest I now try to avoid travelling SiL if I can, why should my money go to company shareholders and not be put back into the services I am travelling on?"
A valid point, but equally why should you fund the French public transport system?
|
|
|
|
Post by donnytom on Oct 17, 2006 17:17:31 GMT
At least when it goes to Souter's lot, the money is more likely to stay in Britain! To avoid money going to shareholders, Isle Coaches might be the best bet. That or walking!
|
|
|
|
Post by yorks06 on Oct 17, 2006 17:25:48 GMT
Exactly even though the likes of First, Stagecoach, Mass, Powells etc get critised on here & by the public/ press for one thing or another atleast when you hand over the money it stays in the british transport system & even if it goes to the directors back pocket or shareholders its still mostly in the UK, where as Veolia id imagine is on the French version of our stock market therefore the people who benefit are the shareholders in France and the company directors over there & also what exactly do they do for the general public provide contract routes which odds are if they didn't run somebody else would hardly like First, Stagecoach, Arriva, Powells and many others who provide commercial services & compete, to me Dunn-Line/ Veolia is a business which has found a easy way to make money i.e. contract work as opposed to commercial & competitive work and theyll stick to that and expand via it & keep well out of the way of anybody else when it comes to commercial service.
|
|
|